• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      …how would them ignoring requests cause injury??? We’re still talking about bluedky, right? The online twitter clone without musk as it’s main selling point?

      • jackeryjoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        If someone was doxxing you on bluesky, for example, and in the doxxing, you got attacked/injured by someone who recognized you/went to your house.

        • SPOOSER@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Then the person liable to you would be the person doxxing you, not Bluesky themselves unless Bluesky themselves was the party that doxxed you and in that case I don’t think a court would hold you to the arbitration.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            We’ve seen Disney try but then withdraw an attempt to enforce arbitration when a lady died from an allergic reaction in their* restaurant. Her partner had signed up for Disney+ free trial. It’s not unimaginable a court would hold you to it since we’re already in Upsidedown World where forced arbitrary is legal.