I have seen a lot of tesla vandalism online the last few days and I’m kind of on the fence about it.

I’ve seen several examples locally here in BC, Canada.

I think totally warranted at newly purchased teslas going forward. Also it serves as a deterrent for potential future buyers.

But vandalizing a car that is a few years old I think is lame. Those driversare already being punished enough by driving something around that’s worth less than scrap.

  • rabber@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I’m not defending the action but just explaining to you that it literally falls under the definition of vandalism.

    If someone wrote on your car with their finger you would probably feel upset and a little violated.

    Also this doesn’t exactly apply to this vehicle as it’s made out of steel but if you press dirt into your car’s paint with your finger you will scratch the clearcoat. I feel like I shouldn’t need to explain this even but dirt is in fact, very small rocks.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If someone did it to my car, I’d wipe it off (maybe, unless I was in a hurry) because I’m not a snowflake looking for outrage.

      If tried to file a report, the police would laugh at me because that’s fucking absurd.

      I tried explain to you that, fpr all practical matters, you are incorrect, but fortunately for me, I’m not too invested in educating you on what vandalism is and isn’t.

      Have a good day!

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Writing in dirt is just not vandalism.

      You insisting otherwise makes it seem like you might not be asking this question in good faith.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Y’all act like OP wrote the damn laws.

        In many places, “writing” with the dust on a car is legally considered vandalism. It doesn’t matter how temporary it is, or if it washes off with a stiff breeze or a light rain. Here in Texas, it’d fall under criminal mischief for “intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner”. Whether or not a court will spend the time hearing such a case is another story, but it’s technically illegal, as the laws are written.

          • Chozo@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Here in Texas, it’d fall under criminal mischief

            […]

            Whether or not a court will spend the time hearing such a case is another story

            • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 minute ago

              Lots of random bullshit could get you charged with “criminal mischief” if the cop is feeling like being a dick.

              That’s not vandalism nor is there any proof anyone has ever been charged for it.

              Show me the law specifically

      • rabber@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is literally vandalism. I didn’t write the law. Lol

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It is not. Writing “wash me” is not vandalism. This is not vandalism. Outside of the courtroom, reality is more important than a legal definition.

          Moreover, legal definitions are irrelevant to whether an act is moral. Your fixation on this point in the face of so many people highlighting that no harm has been done again suggests you’re not arguing in good faith.