• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Unfortunately that’s standard for pretty much every service in existence until the government determines otherwise or the users demand it en masse. No company is going to willingly expose themselves to any more risk than they absolutely have to. There’s zero benefit to them.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Let’s not call disabling the right to sue a “business risk”. That’s like calling the right to stop paying for the service a “risk” - it’s riskdiculous.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Let’s not call disabling the right to sue a “business risk”.

        …and why not?

        That’s like calling the right to stop paying for the service a “risk”

        But…that’s what it is? I promise if they could remove that risk with a few words in the TOS, and it was legal, they’d all be doing that too.