• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The only one I know of shut down and the admin posted this message:

        I knew Lemmy had its challenges, but I hoped it would evolve for the better. Sadly after 2 years, the culture of censorship through defederation has only grown stronger.

        So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship. A few people in that thread linked to another instance I’ve never heard of as an alternative and that one 404s if you type in the address so I guess they’re all still on reddit and twitter.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          So they shutdown because they couldn’t federate with any other instances and considered that censorship

          Damn, I actually didn’t see that coming, I guess they will move the goal post from any starting point.

          • Gloomy@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I’m going to play devil’s advocate and ask: How is it not censorship?

            • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Cause no one is stopping you from going to said instance and just having the discussion there.

              If there was this super important leak that needed to be out there, if it’s posted on a right wing instance that is a defederated ghost town, it’s still out there. People can link to it and leverage the instance to have the needed discussions.

              Censorship means removing access, defederation does not wipe it off of the Internet.

              • Gloomy@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I would argue that censorship includes the suppression of information in its definition, not only it’s removal.

                • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  The information isn’t being suppressed, just not allowed to seep our of the trash bin it’s currently in

                  If you want the garbage it’s easy to find. Most normal people don’t, so it gets kept where it won’t taint everything

                  • Gloomy@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Same logic applied to something the right does:

                    “We are not banning books, we are just not allowing them in libraries and schools. You can always buy them if you feel the need to expose your child to them.”

                    So, following your logic, the right isn’t suppressing information about LGTBQI+ people.

                    Dont get me wrong please, I don’t think right wing content should stand unchallenged. I am just not a big fan of only allowing the “correct” information. Because, that is what the right is doing already (while screaming about free speach, mind you). I think it’s better to engage with right content and destroy it with arguments, rather then just banning it. I know I’m a minority with that opinion on Lemmy. I’m fine with that.