• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean, yeah. Then promptly pardoned.

    That’s the fucked up thing about this. The president can order his people to do things illegally in an “official act” and get immunity. Then pardon the people who do his illegal stuff.

    The “checks and balances” require republicans to oppose their king. That ain’t happening.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Contempt is not pardonable. They do the time one way or the other if things work out the way they’re written.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Pardoning contempt at the federal level is a constitutional crisis in and of itself. There’s nothing that explicitly prevents a pardon.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          There is actually, a pardon requires a preexisting conviction and no one is ever convicted of judicial contempt only sanctioned because of it.

          Someone is probably going to bring up the Biden preemptive pardons which were actually a smart move. Essentially Trump floated the idea of preemptive pardons so the Biden admin tested the waters first any determination that they are legal or illegal would effect them before any subsequent attempt to pardon or convict someone. They very intelligently blocked Trump admin preemptive pardons in doing it.