Yeah, that’s a fair point. Substitute with ‘citizens of Israel’ then.

Unconscionable. What Hamas did was inexcusable, but Hamas doesn’t treat Palestinians any better than they do Jews as a matter of public record. I get that Hamas have exploited just about any effort to help the average Palestinian ever attempted, but that should not be an argument against helping what amounts to more victims of Hamas.

That seems in line with the general level of mental health of the country.

…Yeah, I didn’t think so either.

Could somebody explain to me precisely how either of those things have anything to do with “DEI”? Or what Nazism and Islamism have to do with Marxism for that matter?

While I don’t mind laissez-faire in principle, that not my favorite anarcho-flavor and I don’t wanna :)

Hell, why even have organic search results at all? Just rank results by how much each site owner is willing to bribe pay. A protection racket for the 21st century.

“That’s a nice website you’ve got there. It’d be a shame if it got no visitors.”

What a waste of bandwidth, energy and time.

Sure, let’s erode the idea that words have actual meaning some more. After all, there’s no need to change laws if we can just change the definition of the things they cover instead.

Maybe the meaning of ‘taxation’ should be changed to ‘racket’ while we’re at it.

Something here is “void and vacant” to be sure, but it isn’t Biden’s pardons.

I suppose doubling down on being an utter useless fool is still easier on the ego than owning up to having negligently murdered your own daughter.

So he’s a coward too. Lovely.

I used to boycott Tesla. I still do, but I used to, too.

A lot of things could happen. Maybe Unicorns will be discovered in the wild tomorrow, which would be about as likely as this happening.

Respect the judiciary or leave the country.

It must be nice to be amoral, unburdened by principles, unshackled by intellectual honesty and unhampered by hypocrisy: They can shamelessly do anything and still sleep like a baby when they’re done.

“Hey I can reduce the amount of stress I feel by unilaterally make other people feel x10 as much, but that sounds like a their kind of problem. Pft. Taking responsibility for my own life? What am I, some sort of adult?”

It’s the core of the criminal mind-set: That somebody else should non-consensually pay the price for the criminal’s actions.

It wouldn’t stop Americans either I daresay; it would “just” criminalize expressing it.

“The 1st amendment? Wazzat? Does it make me richer?” – US Republicans, probably.

Yup, that sounds like Trump’s spiritual advisor, all right. On the other hand, he’s not looking to render the poor down for biofuel production unlike Thiel’s Guru Yarwin, so there’s that I guess.

Meanwhile, the FBI apparently has plenty of resources to run around persecuting people not for their actions, but for their environmental views. Forget neo-nazis and traitors, who clearly only wants what’s best for their country - the lovable little scamps. /s

This is my surprise face: (・―・)

I don’t, no. I do wonder how many pounds of cocaine a person has to snort to make a statement like that without vomiting from abject self-loathing in the process though.

This is some serious world class assholery.