Problem is that no vaccine is 100% effective, so groups which don’t vaccinate result in the virus circulating, and pose a very real risk to those of us who do vaccinate

Mind you, NYC accepted a deposit from the federal government. Kinda like your employer deciding they didn’t feel like giving you your last paycheck, and yanking it back.

You won’t need one if you’ve got Javascript working and don’t run a browser extension which strips off the gift token

Nah. That was to support the Russian takeover.

The “malnourished fuckface” was working for Triple Canopy, part of what used to be called Blackwater. Talk is easy. Taking a bullet is not.

What they’re doing as a result of constituent pressure is voting ‘no’ on everything. It’s not having a huge impact yet because confirming cabinet appointments only needs 51 votes, and Republicans have that with a few to spare.

The place it’ll be meaningful is on the debt ceiling increase, where it will take Democratic votes to pass it in both houses.

The objection was always that somebody dark-skinned might be President, or that assets might be expropriated from billionaires, not that tyranny might be an issue.

Little-known fact: US sanctions are similarly keyword based. So if you call your international terrorist group Exxon, you can cause real problems for the oil company

That’s the problem with being on the side of the rule of law: you’re constrainted by it, but the side of lawlessness is not.

We could be, but are also avoiding a lot of drownings that are likely if we try disassembling it while at sea

We are very very far from anything like the Star Trek prosperity society though. I’m not expecting changes to monetary policy to be able to get us there either; they’re a way to moderately improve peoples’ lot, and to shift the balance of power from capital to labor and tiny bit

It was part of how we got out of the Great Depression — it transferred money from the owning class to people who had debts. We don’t actually want to go back to gold (or any other non-inflationary currency) because it gets rid of the flexibility to do that, which part of how we prevent bad recessions from turning into deflationary recessions.

In any case, having fiat currency, or not, is a separate issue from whether the US will actually pay its debts as promised. And it’s the debt payment that Trump is putting in question.

A lot of countries have defaulted without doing that. I’m a lot more concerned that it’ll cause an interest rate spike, with associated stock market crash, and bring on a sharp cut in business investment and employment.

The FBI knew what their plan actually was

:P