• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





  • I’m confused. Are you saying YOU can’t tell the difference, or that their is no technical difference?

    Because, anecdotally, I’ve owned a variety of these devices, and I can absolutely tell the difference. Which sucks, because I bought cheaper devices hoping for reasonable parity of experience. I’m not saying my cheaper devices are bad, just that clearly the Shield TV performs better.

    As to the actual specs, there is also clearly a real world difference between the bog standard Amlogic SoC (1/8, 2/8, 2/16), and the Tegra SoC.

    It’s entirely reasonable to argue that the difference isn’t worth the extra cost, fine. But it’s dishonest to say there is no appreciable difference.

    TBF I haven’t used the newer “low cost” Shield with the 2/16 Tegra SoC, so I can’t really speak to how it performs relative to something like Chromecast with Google TV.



  • I said Playstore Certified, and yes, they are mostly the same when you look under the hood, at least for those classes of devices, per generation.

    Same, or similar SoC, with 2/8 (sometimes 2/16) specs.

    Once you get up to the 4/32 range, you’re already looking around the same price (+/-) of a Shield TV.

    Also, lol @ citing LTT, for anything. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day, doesn’t change the fact that it’s broken.

    And for the sake of being fair, I didn’t even mention the 1/8 boards.



  • As someone who owns both Nvidia Shield TV and standard cheap (Google certified) devices, all running Projectivy, it’s not really comparable.

    The Shield runs smoother, has significantly less minor/annoying issues, and actually receives fairly regular updates.

    Now, the new Chromecast with Google TV does get updates, but it doesn’t resolve the first two differences.

    If you can’t afford, or justify the extra expense, for an Nvidia Shield TV, completely understandable. But don’t pretend that the user experience is the same, because it’s not.







  • America cannot dominate the world militarily, nor could that even serve the goals of its contemporary brand of neoimperialism.

    Soft power i.e. culture, propaganda, and diplomatic/idealogical relationships, are the foundation upon which it’s built.

    Yes, military hard power plays a critical role, but it cannot replace soft power.

    This isn’t empire for the sake of raw nationalism, and nothing would accelerate the American collapse faster than dismantling the state’s soft power tools. The end result will be attempts to maintain power by spending its military resources on peer, or near peer conflicts.


  • That’s an incredibly myopic take that confuses correlation with causation.

    These moves may benefit Putin, but Russia isn’t the only county to benefit. Infact, Russia is in a historically weak position to fill gaps left by a receding American empire.

    I’d wager that China is likely to see much more geopolitical gains because they have the resources and capacity to take advantage of the situation.

    I’m not saying Putin won’t benefit, just pointing out how limiting it is to view Trump through a singular lens.