if two parties are both ignoring the population, maybe a third party should be considered a more serious option… this settling for lesser of two evils amounts to a lack of vision- have you have stopped believing in accountability? is it merely impossible and pointless to think about?
‘if if if’ nevermind what is and has been happening… a party should lose support for genocide, especially when that side is ostensibly for social justice.
and that’s my prerogative as a voter. are you here to shame me some more? about the genocide i won’t overlook to vote for kamala harris? the same kamala harris who reversed her position on fracking? who wanted to fund nato even harder? you’re gonna tell me she represented a positive position on climate change?? and bath-tub of collard green kamala harris is not doing a damn thing for civil rights, so where are you coming from with this?
it is safe because i didn’t allow myself to reduce supporting genocide to a trolley problem.
and sometimes you have a conscience that doesn’t allow you to rationalize away complicity in genocide
axis of evil and has been. you vote democrat, you vote republican, you vote for genocide. simple as.
real quick: how do these options develop if we keep telling ourselves that?