Well if the votership has anything to do with it: something around 30 to 40% would happily volunteer that information.

Oh yes because immigrating to a different country is such an easy task

Oof, hell no. That’s some Facebook level cancer right there when they removed downvotes.

It’s just a form of white washing that makes the same people who made up being offended by “black lists” and “master branch”.

Is there a record of these collated somewhere?

Shitty time to be alive when it’s no longer cool to shoot Nazis.

It’s an absolute PITA in my experience.

I tried this with TD Canada. Accessing the money was problematic.

Because breaking things is easy and building things is hard? Also doesn’t help when nearly half of your elected representatives work against building things.

Keep saying it as if it was never addressed because that’s what works.

If you say something enough times it is reality to the majority of the voter base in the US.

If you ignore all refutes logic or facts and simply steam ahead with your word being the only right word then that will become reality

It’s really disingenuous to mud sling people with a different view by implying they themselves don’t exist/are astroturfing/are bots.

I’m a real human who decided to use their service for kicks and actually like some of the benefits and control over the results compared to other search engines.

Especially when I’m doing research, which is usually half of all my time searching anyways.

Enough that I decided to pay for the service. I’m happy with it and want to share that happiness with others. Are you saying that because I liked a service that I can’t seem to get anywhere else I’m now the bad guy? Because I like something and want to share it with others, that’s bad?

Is the alternative that you might prefer to be corporate astroturfing instead of organic discussion and growth? Like, really, seriously, what’s the alternative here if people talking about and sharing something they like is not acceptable?