Well there wasn’t any path for anyone to report anyone before so this is better than nothing.

Hmm

Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias alongside AARP Illinois

Guess the old regulations might have been eating into profits

Still out of 55,000 administered tests only 97 failed. Imho they should keep the restriction because it did remove 97 unsafe drivers.

However, This also creates a path for immediate family members to report unsafe elderly family members. There was no way to report anyone before this was created.

So is it midlyinfurating? I suppose in that it may allow unsafe drivers to stay on the roads but with immediate family reporting it could also be a wash. I very much doubt these changes will pull more unsafe drivers than the regulations from before since family members will probably be hesitant to report elderly family members

Thats what happens when DOGE fires a bunch of NOAA meteorologists.

Idk. Seems like this was occurring in 2012 too.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-188596/

Understood. Correcting

I hope Stephen Miller’s toilet paper turns to sandpaper every time he tries to use it.

Edit:

Apologies for accidentally cursing Steve Miller

Right but they would still have time to respond on top of that it’s not like the US is very close to China. And even if we did send her aircraft carriers in to go mess with China that would be a really hard fight for the United states. I don’t think it would go well.

On top of the fact that China really wants the US position in the world to be weak. It would be very beneficial for China to be the strongest and take over that title because it sure as shit isn’t going to Russia right now

Can you show me in the Constitution where that is explicitly outlawed? Because I’ve read the entire Constitution and it says nothing about legislation hiring private security.

I didn’t say the Democrats should force their way in, I just said that they should bring armed private security and then make a scene.

I said nothing of open Revolt. You are adding implications to thing my comment.

Regardless it would be nice if the Democrats put a little more energy into things and stop with this performative bullshit like going to an ice facility they know they won’t be allowed in. Is it bullshit yeah but they should probably make a bigger fuss about it at the place like when Senator Padilla got arrested. Makes better headlines.

As far as being a state actor I would be a piss poor State actor.

Did anyone else notice that you couldn’t use this on an Android device because it it may put the people who use it at risk?

For shame Android

Developer may not actually understand how phones work

https://lemmy.ml/comment/19647328

Given that China has the world’s seconds largest economy and they are trying to break into all of the foreign markets the US is currently in I don’t think they care.

I’m sure some of them care about their portfolio but that’s going to look great under Trump.

I think for them if the US goes full fascist it’s a win-win.

As long as we’re focused on our own internal politics and not messing with China or trying to disable their economy I really really don’t think they care.

Edit: Do you guys at least have a source on this claim that China wants a stable us?

Oh yes wasting everybody’s time by demanding to be let in to do an inspection when they know they’re not going to be let in.

We’ve done this song and dance before. They’ll go to court and they’ll be let in for a token inspection.

As far as armed contingent not that the Democrats are going to do shit but private security is definitely a thing. So is armed private security.

At least I’m not spreading around dead ideas that don’t work that waste people’s time and and activism.

Edit: FYI depending on the frontend you use, you can add a user tag so that you can tag me as “fake Leninist” and save us both sometime

For instance I got you as “boot” probably for some defense of the United States that we argued about.

How is this doing their job and what did they accomplish?

Uh I don’t think so. I think China wants to see the us position significantly weakened.

Why on earth do they want a stable Us?

Ice has shown extreme cowardice when power is equal between parties and showing up with an armed force could be effective.

Better than this performative bullshit.

Russia will not cut off China especially with the western sanctions. That would be russia cutting off their nose to spite their face.

It seems China is hoping to weaken us imperialism and it would make sense they would wanna see a Russian Victory. That directly weaken US force projection and put a us proxy on its backfoot.

Edit:

Lots of conjecture yet no sources China really wants the US stable. I really don’t think so.

I disagree. Plenty of people want change but just don’t know where to go.

I’m creating a local communist group to help with that. 😄

Cheers comrade

Yeah thats also a problem. Living in the Imperial core definitely has some disadvantages.

That’s true. Unfortunately the Democrats have been practically useless but as I’m beginning to see they have always been kind of practically useless

His own lawyer requested to keep him in jail because they fear the moment he is released he will be immediately deported again.

Our system is so broken that sitting in jail is preferable to being on release because of DHS.

For some reason I think I was referring to Australia. Not sure why