“Jeanne Price said her daughter, who was a new employee, made attempts in July to secure time off, but either didn’t qualify or was told she’d have to wait. Two business days after she notified her supervisors that she planned to apply for disability leave, they fired her.”
That’s not true, and it’s frustrating to see such confidence coming from someone who’s really active in the community. I’ve pasted the whole thing, section 2, article 19 of the state constitution. I’ll add section 20 for context, so you can be certain that “bill” does not somehow mean initiative.
SECTION 19. BILL TO CONTAIN ONE SUBJECT
No bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.
SECTION 20. ORIGIN AND AMENDMENT OF BILLS
Any bill may originate in either house of the legislature, and a bill passed by one house may be amended in the other.
I continue to be reaffirmed in my belief that this is one of the greatest constitutional protections in the modern world. “No bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title” 10/10, no notes.
Do you have more information on this, or a phrase to Google? The idea of zero traffic, zero petty crime sounds incredibly impressive
I’d be mindful about being so prescriptive with solutions like that. What works well for you may not work well for someone else. But I do appreciate your input! Maybe try sharing it with more “I statements”?
It’s a somewhat common thing with ADHD folks. As different parts of the brain start to fall asleep, there’s a sweet spot where our brains are finally balanced. In other words, our limited executive function has adequate energy to manage just the fraction of the brain that’s still awake.
I agree that straight up using Tailscale would likely be easier. But to answer your question, you’re looking to “push routes” because what you actually want to do is “route” but that’s kinda hard to Google haha. This looks maybe promising: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/wireguard-how-to-route-another-subnet-through-it.89744/
This approach largely works, with the caveat that it then requires you to always be on the tailnet. If someone wants to connect locally AND via tailnet using the same URL, they’ll need to push/advertise routes (or do some other hacky thing)
Right now, I’ve only got the spoons to provide rough guidance, not details. In order to use non-tailnet IPs, you’ll need to configure your tailnet host to “advertise routes/push routes”. In more laymen terms, tailnet needs to say, “hey network client, I do know where 192.168.0.69 is! So I can route that request”. By default, each tailnet host only advertises the other tailnet hosts. Anything else fails.
Also, I really appreciate how detailed your question is!
Are there examples of neutral news sources that you like?
Well, if the Republicans hate it, it’s probably reasonable. Let’s check the article. “It would require the Secretary of State’s Office to check addresses during the signature verification process and it would require signature gatherers to sign a declaration on each sheet of signatures they collect.”
That’s basically the smallest, least intrusive thing that can be done to prevent fraud. It’s kinda wild that wasn’t already in place, but that probably explains the ease with which unpopular, right-wing, corporate-sponsored initiatives have been ending up on the ballot 🙄
I just did it by thinking up this UUID: 4d6b3a08-e1b5-407c-bb6c-cbac830ff4bd
“the annual risk of a given person being hit by a meteorite is estimated to be one chance in 17 billion, which means the probability is about 0.00000000006 (6 × 10−11), equivalent to the odds of creating a few tens of trillions of UUIDs in a year and having one duplicate. In other words, only after generating 1 billion UUIDs every second for the next 100 years, the probability of creating just one duplicate would be about 50%.”
Broadly, a person can only control their reactions to situations; they can’t control others. It’s part of establishing healthy boundaries. Your scenario would be an excellent topic to bring up in therapy because it’s a real and recurring issue that probably has a lot of interesting depth to explore
I find this hard to believe, because surely they’ve rushed past the point where it kinda horseshoes around and accidentally starts stabilizing, right?