France and the UK’s nuclear arsenal is minuscule compared to the US stockpile.

And a lot of the nukes at NATO bases are on loan from the US, so if the US pulls out there will not be nearly as many bombs close to Russia.

Anyone insane enough to start a nuclear war may decide that absorbing a hundred or so nukes isn’t so bad when they have hundreds of Cold War era bunkers and thousands of their own nukes.

Man, I hate when planes suddenly and randomly decide to swerve of their own accord.

Shame on this airport for not employing proper airplane trainers.

The monkey was clearly a highly trained intelligence operative

Said over the deafening sound of a billion solar starship blowing up in the lower atmosphere

Westworld

A rocket is not fundamentally new and hasn’t been for almost 100 years.

Rockets perform correctly when they deliver their payload to the correct orbit.

You can calculate the energy density of fuels, the efficiency of your engines at various atmospheric pressures, and determine the payload size you can deliver with your engines and fuel. Blowing up rockets for “tests” is so 1950s. We have whole college programs on rocket design. We have desktop computers more powerful than anything available in the 1960s, and NASA managed to design the Saturn V, a rocket of similar size to starship, with the computers of the time and fucking slide rules. The Saturn V had its problem, but each rocket managed to deliver its payload and perform its part of the mission without blowing up.

Your comment is classic tech bro. No understanding of real engineering principles and only a desire to shove some shit out of the door as fast as possible.