Yeah, don’t misunderstand me. I don’t mind them existing, but I don’t want to see it. My mistake maybe by browsing all using scaled sort tho, top is usually fine. But I usually just don’t browse all, I curate my subscribed comms instead.

Especially with a lot of the content being posted on there is not just nsfw but also super fringe. I feel there’s a lot of uncomfortable things being posted, but I might just be sensitive…

Ah right. I’ve ran Arch before but got tired of things breaking sometimes so I wanted something more stable. How stable is EOS? Are a lot of manual fixes needed?

How does EOS compare to Pop?

If you don’t read the article, this sounds worse than it is. I think this is the important part:

ChatGPT’s persuasion performance is still short of the 95th percentile that OpenAI would consider “clear superhuman performance,” a term that conjures up images of an ultra-persuasive AI convincing a military general to launch nuclear weapons or something. It’s important to remember, though, that this evaluation is all relative to a random response from among the hundreds of thousands posted by everyday Redditors using the ChangeMyView subreddit. If that random Redditor’s response ranked as a “1” and the AI’s response ranked as a “2,” that would be considered a success for the AI, even though neither response was all that persuasive.

OpenAI’s current persuasion test fails to measure how often human readers were actually spurred to change their minds by a ChatGPT-written argument, a high bar that might actually merit the “superhuman” adjective. It also fails to measure whether even the most effective AI-written arguments are persuading users to abandon deeply held beliefs or simply changing minds regarding trivialities like whether a hot dog is a sandwich.

I had the exact same question some months ago: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/30340942 before I decided to swear off news completely haha.