Trans females!

Yes totally, but I still kind of expected tries.

I’m not condoning violence but I’m kind of surprised no one have yet taken an RPG shot at elons jet or something. Even blowing it up empty would send a message I guess.

I mean someone actually shot at drump so it can’t be that complicated.

That must have been soo frightening! :-)

Possible but then they are making a really bad job doing it.

Hey thank you! I’m definitely saving this off for my future calculations!

You’re totally correct about the rest, and I’m now able to roughly see if I should buy a 800 system or two, or theee… Electric hookups included in the calculation of course.

Smart planning! Thanks for the story, are you planning to go off grid or is it just to be economically free? Any batteries in the future? Excellent reference, and implementation, I’m giving you an 11 out of ten!

Yeah I get all that, but what if I need heating in the winter and have very low consumption in the summer? That is why I’m searching for real world numbers. If you give me some for a specific place then I can at least have a ballpark number if what I might get where I live.

OTOH as you say, they start to be so cheap it’s almost impossible to go wrong…

Lash lash lol you’re going down like a russian tanker in medium wind

I’m still trying to figure out the endgame of this cable-cutting.

Everything that results from it seems to be benefical for the west/EU/NATO and nothing of interest for russia.

Do you have any numbers :-) ?

That’s a massive installation though! Wow!

Also, you got a biig roof!

So far right populists, against far left populusts? No, against “left”.

I bet far right populists lie more than any non-populists.

This is really nice! This is the future!

I’d love to know how much they produce, especially during the winter/monthly.

French electricity enters the chat.

If you pay 3000€ for an inverter then that’s probably included installing and whatnot. You can get a cheap 50€ 4kW inverter on aliexpress, or an expensive 500€ 10kW one.

The fact that you can achieve a constant average query time, regardless of the hash table’s fullness, was wholly unexpected — even to the authors themselves.

WTF?

I mean first of all, the “article” is just crap IMO, like only hinting att “anazing” things. But also containing basic errors like the above. It’s like they don’t understand complexity, a constant average time on what? A specific size of a hash table? Or do they mean it scales linearly with its size? Just go through the whole table and voila you have constant time already.

So if they did find something, it’s not well explained in the article IMO. Shame, cause those kind of things are interesting, IMO.

Edit: looks like they “cheat” (in a good way) to “reorder” the table to get their results with smarter inserts (their ‘elastic hashing’) so to not reorder the table. If so, then it’s very smart but not groundbreaking. I’m sick and just skimmed the paper, don’t kill me.

Yes, IMO tech is moving towards getting easier.

I’m not saying it is, but I bet that in a couple of years you can spin up a corporate website-management-platform on a 50€ raspberry instead of having a whole IT department managing emails, webservers and so on.

Things are getting easier and easier IMO.