![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/5c3b1e3c-61fd-454f-93fe-a79a997736a5.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
I’m sure he is just referencing Norway which originally claimed the land before “somehow” Denmark got it, right?
I’m sure he is just referencing Norway which originally claimed the land before “somehow” Denmark got it, right?
Really people should go to the kernel threads and read all of them carefully and the links to the social media and read them careful too, it’s not too big.
No, people who aren’t involved with the kernel should not get involved with this, that’s Torvald’s point. You can’t let a serious project like Linux be affected by social media uproar, let the developers sort it out amongst themselves.
Depends on your instance’s definition. We define it as:
We once banned a few accounts for mass down voting, i.e. their (total downvotes - total upvotes) were over 6 000. One account had downvoted more than 10 000 times in a single community.
At programming.dev “vote manipulation” is against out Code of Conduct and we would send the user a warning to stop. I’m sure your instance has something similar written down.
A lot of famous scientists make their breakthroughs at fairly young age, before their mind gets locked into a certain paradigm. Look up Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which forwards some interesting ideas on how science is conducted.