data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ad4c/5ad4caa87a76eec7d7dc11b4b0ea75733a82cce7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72053/720535b0fd70f4eae0504f393829dadaac10a76b" alt=""
31·
7 days agocause they’re honestly pretty shit and known to be unreliable.
Can you elaborate here? I’ve had very few issues with Flatpaks and the documentation is pretty thorough. I’m curious what wider issues it has to make the whole ecosystem “pretty shit” and unreliable.
I don’t believe this to be the case with Flathub, only the Fedora repo. I’m asking about the wider flatpak ecosystem, not the fedora-specific repo or how it’s setup.
I’d agree that seems like a needless hoop at the very least, but my concern is more to do with the growing trend to shit on Flatpaks as an ecosystem, not just this particular instance of Fedora head-assery.
I think it’s decent software and has really solid use-cases, far from unreliable shit at least in my own anecdotal experience. But my experience is limited, which was why I asked the OP to elaborate on actual flaws they see with the Flatpak ecosystem.