

Ideally we would have open borders so I kind of hoped we wouldn’t target anyone
Ideally we would have open borders so I kind of hoped we wouldn’t target anyone
As a naturalized citizen this is horrific. If he gets kicked out anyone can.
So you are only capable of ad hominem discussions? That really speaks to your intellectual skills.
You know you can just be opposed to authoritarianism. Most decent folk are.
What article? It’s not the article being discussed and your google link sucks for the reasons already explained.
You need to provide a source if you are quoting one.
No, there isn’t. Anyone claiming to support the liberation of the working classes while praising authoritarian systems that are cracking down on those populations looking for freedom are hypocrites.
It’s weird you would make this about geographic location. Are you doing that because you don’t have a valid critique?
Nope, that’s been used for decades you are just seeing the limitations of google’s tools as it happened in places they do not index
This wasn’t an editorial. It was a snarky comment that you inappropriately are trying to make into an argument because you completely misread the situation
I think you need to be actually arguing with someone to make an argument against them, yes. You cannot make an argument when you aren’t doing so. You need to be debating to make logical fallacies. No one was doing that hence no one made a strawman argument.
Do you need this further explained? No argument was made. The side you are claiming I am making a strawman argument against is not present. There is no debate.
You used it wrong. Learn from this and move on. Don’t misuse them in the future.
You cannot present a strawman argument when the side you are arguing against isn’t present. Thus I was not making a straw man. That’s just insulting tankies
Don’t bring these up unless you understand them and in this case you do not.
They never made a straw man argument because they qualify it with the second part that you cut off. Why did you do that?
It seems you might not understand what downvotes are for then. Downvotes are for things that do not contribute to discussion so things like insults or actively dangerous suggestions should be downvoted.
Suggesting what is a very typical path to addiction for addicts is very bad advice and should not be shared. When someone is foolish enough to do so it should be downvoted because the whole discussion is toxic
You are using straw man incorrectly. Don’t even try to go down the path of rhetorical flaws if you fuck that one up.
It’s really only a matter of degrees as you can sell other things for a profit so why not your literature?
Then you do understand why people are downvoting because this is bad advice and others dont want people to see it.
We absolutely still live in a world of scarcity. Im not sure why you think otherwise.
Some because not everyone creates the same value or works as hard as others. We should have things that motivate people to willingly take on riskier or more challenging work. We shouldn’t hope that someone is going to show up and be willing to do brain surgery when we need it.
Which is true for China as well
Lower karma posts are less likely to be seen?
I have a Harris tweed Teapot Cozy. It is one of my favorite things in my kitchen. I should have thought of that.