data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba74d/ba74dcd1aafec5e1c810375bdf4f14b67af62e0c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf35/ddf354114a8d2551b057bab28883da201e9b87f6" alt=""
Generally, you want to salt ss early in the process as tasting is possible. Allowing it to cook into the food makes it more effective, and you’ll usually end up using less overall.
Generally, you want to salt ss early in the process as tasting is possible. Allowing it to cook into the food makes it more effective, and you’ll usually end up using less overall.
Because its value was always fictitious.
Uhhhh, I dunno, I suppose that’s possible. Rotten Tomatoes wasn’t around in 2000, was it? Would they have aggregated from, like, newspaper reviews at the time?
This came out a year BEFORE the first F&F movie.
I JUST rewatched Gone in Sixty Seconds on a whim, on like Thursday, and spotted that it apparently has a 38% critic rating from Rotten Tomatoes. Fuck that noise, that movie is a materpiece of filmography.
Many of the articles from those platforms are useless noise, but I do still occasionally want to read something that’s posted. When that happens, I just F12 and bypass the paywall, or look for the comment that has the article text, from someone else who has already done that.
I was thinking the same thing. Perhaps an “English isn’t my first language” scenario?