Are folks considering 50501 one of the main coalescing forces? That’s been the only one I’ve seen with any traction.

“When you ask those guys, why can’t you spend more on national security, their argument is because it would require us to make cuts to welfare programs, to unemployment benefits, to being able to retire at 59 and all these other things,” Rubio said. “That’s a choice they made. But we’re subsidizing that?”

Hmmm.