Playground tactics is the only thing that works on Trump and the novo facists. Time to use their terminology against them - Donald Trump should now only be referred to as the Cuckold-in-Chief

Llama has several restrictions making it quite a bit less open than Grok or DeepSeek.

To be clear, that one is not as insightful as one may initially think. See https://singlelunch.com/2023/09/13/the-bad-economics-of-wtfhappenedin1971/

I mean, this is the only rational response.

No country would be collectively dumb enough to not do this, right?

It’s a bit hard to tell from the public information on the subject, but either way, it’s not a per-view model - which cannot exist in a fixed-price all-access environment for practical reasons.

I’m not sure how practical it would be to do the royalty payments on an individual user consumption level, but I have little insight into the implementation here.

No, YouTube premium is the same.

That being said, from what I am aware of, Nebula still pays creators more than YouTube per view.

I think it’s really important that we stop talking in terms of payment on a per-view basis - Nebula does not pay on a per-view basis. Nebula uses the same model as music streaming companies, i.e. a pro rata stream share model. This means that creators get paid based on how large of a percentage of the total streaming time was on their content. No additional money is generated for each view, it’s conceptually still a fraction of what you pay monthly. The more content you view on the platform, the less each view conceptually pays.