Summary

  • Nissan’s pride and denial hindered merger talks, sources say
  • Honda pushed Nissan for deeper cuts to jobs, factory capacity, sources say
  • Nissan unwilling to consider factory closures, sources say
  • Honda’s proposal to make Nissan a subsidiary caused tensions, sources say
  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That way though you would have to haul around the electrolyzing equipment with you which seems redundant and it’s pretty heavy. I’m not sure that would necessarily work.

    Also in that scenario you would have to keep the water on board so that you could electrolyze it again. That adds even more weight. A molecule of water weighs 18 times more than a single hydrogen atom so every single time you run this process your vehicle suddenly gets massively heavier.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think you misunderstood me. I’m saying good trucks would use the fuel, not generate it. They’d stop at warehouses and hubs and whatnot to refuel using “waste” energy from the warehouse or hub.

      The whole point is that trucks largely take routine routes, so it’s fine if availability is limited because they can plan trips around refueling points. Also, they’re massive, so there are plenty of options for storing the hydrogen since space isn’t really an issue.