• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is your brain on religion.

    How is indoctrinating children still legal all around the world?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I don’t think that Christians or Jews have an injunction against burning their scriptures; they won’t care. This is a quirk of Islam.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran_desecration

      In Islamic law, believers must not damage the Quran and must perform a ritual washing before touching it.[1] Conversely, intentionally damaging copies is considered blasphemous in Islam. It is a point of controversy whether non-Muslims should be made to follow Islamic law,[2] and a sensitive topic in international relations how it should be handled when Muslims demand adherence to Islamic Quranic practices by nonbelievers.[3][4][5]

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It is a point of controversy whether non-Muslims should be made to follow Islamic law

        No controversy about it at all. The more that religious fascists insist on controlling others, the more it’s essential that people are free to express ridicule towards them.

        I suppose the equivalent might be performing a play in which Christ is a child abuser or some musical parody of Auschwitz?

        Those expressions should be avoidable though. So that if someone didn’t want to see it they are free to find something else to do. Harassing people (burning a Qur’an outside their home) would be wrong.

        But saying I can’t do something just because that’s a rule for you? Fuck that. Get the matches.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          I think that the article is saying that it’s a point of theological controversy. I.e. not all Muslims have an interpretation that non-Muslims are obliged to follow this rule.

            • FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              I‘m Muslim and I have a huge mostly Muslim family and a large friend circle and I consume mostly Arabic media. We honestly don’t know who you are, we don’t care about you and we have better things to do than trying to enforce any laws on you.

              Fun fact I have some atheists in my family and we did not behead or stone them. This might surprise you, but we have better things to do.

      • Malek061@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The act is political speech nowhere near violence and must be protected. Same with flag burning.

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        If you look at my other comment, I’m not interested in destroying information, or preventing people from reading it. It’s specifically doing something that other people think they have the right to stop me from doing. And as such it serves to highlight those who are hiding the fact that they have a fascist mindset towards me and others.

        To make this clearer, maybe the day after “burn a Qur’an day” should be “read the Qur’an day”.

        I wouldn’t see any contradiction in that

        • FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I get your point and while we don’t know anything yet about the murder it’s likely linked to the guy‘s actions.

          Let’s just go ahead and assume the people arrested killed him for real and they killed him for what he did. Then I think there really are no heroes in that story.

          The guy was inciting hatred for which there was even a trial and it was a pointless act in the sense that I don’t see what good could potentially come from it.

          Did he deserve to die for that? I’m against the capital punishment, so I think no one deserves to die for anything and I agree that the killers are fascists.

          I’m just saying that burning books and executing people isn’t the kind of world I want to live in in general.