• BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The Supreme Court literally told him that it was impossible for the President to break the law while he was in office

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        But then they made lawfulness a subject for Supreme Court review, so only Republicans can be absolute despots. And Biden is a risk-averse institutionalist who would never consider extreme measures (like sending all the corrupt Supreme Court justices to Gitmo).

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        of course not. hes not going to be a precedent so later they say see its fine because biden did it. Man people love these damned if they do, damed if they don’t situations to call out the eternal badguy. I want to know if he still beats his wife?

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          wow I’m so glad he didn’t set a precedent; that must be why the fascist that came after him so strictly goes by the book now.

          I’d like to have what you’re having.