• ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In a purely libertarian society, parks wouldn’t last long. They would either become prohibitely expensive and yet another thing only for the rich, or they would be harvested and the land mined.

    Making them public is the only way to ensure they remain as they are.

    • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Oh yeah, right wing libertarian (based on private property) seems a bad thing for forest, without specific system. I was talking about left wing libertarianism (without private property).

    • Forester@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Conversely, I shouldn’t have to spell out my beliefs in order to be treated as a person

      I’m certain that you’re aware that words like communism, socialism and Marxism have a plethora of negative propaganda associated with them. Likewise, terms like libertarian are also dragged through the mud routinely.

      I hope that in the future we can stop using the worst monsters and strawmen from our peers chosen political affiliation to color our view of those peers.